Lets get this guy fired!

[g3shooter1]

He published an entire list of people in VA with CHL licenses.


Repost this on as many boards as you guys can.

http://www.roanoke.com/editorials/trejbal/wb/108160

[Seattlefungus]

I think he has just shoot himself in the foot. Now readers will ask, what about my personal information on my car registration, My drivers license, My Voters Registration. The Free Press claims a "Public Right to Know", Well, I'm the public and I didn't want to know that. Then there is the question about the state selling personal information. The state of Oregon just got jammed for selling DOL info to marketers about 3 years ago. What needs to be done is public awareness of not Government intrusion. But private business and the "Press"... Then ask, how "Free is the press" when it's existence is based on preying on fear and sensationalizing events to their advantage to sell a product? Are they any different than the tobacco industry claiming smoking has no health risks? They are purely self serving, no way around it...

[k98k792]

I wonder what could be found out about him?

[omerta123]

thats so bogus, what is he gaining on that? and K98k i agree with you, someone should right a report about his deeply personal life and post it

[LorDiego]

I wonder what could be found out about him?

I saw another webpage on this, it was the guy's actual personal blog webpage. He had the same article, 95% of his comments were highly negative..

and yeah, somebody found out his home address and posted it all over the net.

Matter of fact...


CHRISTIAN J TREJBAL
675 SCHOOL LN
CHRISTIANSBURG, VA 24073

[nalioth]

Isn't the phone number public information, too? http://www.novarata.net/devil_01.gif

[okie shooter]

Guys I think the issue here, Is your Conceiled handgun permit, public data subject to open records? If so and you dont like that, then do something about that, like write your state reps and get it changed to be more protected as information like that of your drivers lic, and such. All the guy did was ask the county clerks and they obliged. Anyone could do it if they are willing to pay for the search if he could. Thus its a problem getting the law changed from makeing the list a public record open.

Remember if you applied for the permit, you placed your name on the list, thus makeing it publc record, thats what needs to get changed if you want it to be kept private. Remember you are going after the messager here not the message. The reporter is pointing out what is public reacord. No matter if your agree or disagree with his political view points. What I am trying to say, if you knock this guy out, some one else will do it again, you need to keep the information out of the public reacord to start with.

[rep30cal]

Get him fired? Looks to me like he is doing a good job of getting
himself shot.


:offhead:

[Norton]

I wrote them a blistering letter, saying you have just given every thief in Virgina a list of where you can steal guns from. A list of who's car you can break in when he or she is inside at work. I asked would you print a list of convicted sex offenders living in Virginia? Or Rape victims? Why not it is public record? Our buddy the 'crack' reporter says hey it's public record so it's fair game..
Well Of course not they have privacy issues.. We can't have the sex offender loose his job at the day care center or with the Boy Scouts. He has rights and paid his dues now it's time to leave him alone.
I swear to God I am about to blow a gasket.. Dam smug know it all liberals!
:upyours3:

[okie shooter]

Actually there are websites that you can look up most sex offenders across the us on line. Thus a list of convicted sexoffenders is available in most places without fileing a request.

[AK AJ]

This guy should of stopped writing when he got a pat on the back from the head of his high school newspaper. He's WAY over his head, he has NO clue what he is writing about, And he's a penis. His own editors know that, they whacked his ass first chance they got, his story is gone.

AJ

[LCPL 4]

Story is still there. Database was pulled to "protect" a certain few it seems. The blog comments were almost entirely negative.

+ At least many of the permit owners in that area now realize that the laws need to be changed to make them more private.

- Bad Guys get a free list. I don't buy his point of view. How many criminals would spend $100 bucks for such a list?

[SSwee]

Not many when they could get it free from him.
But that's along the same lines as the yo-yos saying we need more gun control. How many criminals follow the gun laws.
SS

[Seattlefungus]

These "Public Guardians of Free Press" and often a blight on our society. Been a cop for 30 years. In the last ten or so, when there is an officer involved shooting, the press get the officers home address from "Public Tax Records" go to the neighborhood of the officer and go door to door asking "How do you feel about your neighbor the cop shooting some poor felon" Then they time there interviews to catch the officers wife and kids coming home from school and stick a mike in their face. Totally reprehensible!

[okie shooter]

I am going to repeat it again, the guy isn't the problem here nor is the press, there will be some one always with an ax to grind against gun owners always. So no matter what you think about the story and the author there always will be another newspaper to publish it with another writer.

The issue is that your state should make the permits not within the public range of knowledge, your privacy is the issue here. No matter how angry you get at the anti gunners or even those who just feel it should be public knowledge (maybe no anti gun but freedom of information folks, that think there should be no government withholding of information) until you get your authorities to make this information non public it will keep happening, maybe not criminals but you never know who.

[Grasshopper]

"A state that eagerly puts sex offender data online complete with an interactive map could easily do the same with gun permits, but it does not."

This guy knows exactly what he is writing. This is mind control, plain and simple. Look at a gun owner, you know he is a pervert. The term "common sence gun control", we have no common sence? Do a search on Soviet Mind Control. You'll be surprised on how many in the news media use it to shape public opinion. :tinhat:
Joseph Stalin would have liked this guy.:cuss:

[mistersquiggles]

soviet mind control?, :jerkoff: hell! Georg Hegel developed a whole line of propaganda designed to condition a certain response, called the hegelian dialectic and then a short, one nutted austrian with a loud mouth and lame lung almost took over the world by implementing it! returning GI's, reporters, and statesmen took notice of just how powerful hegelian propaganda was, and quite a few came back to the states and built very lucrative and far encompassing businesses using this kind of thing in their advertising schemes........

[iocane]

Till a few years ago the Oregon Department of motor vehicles used to sell a cd that held all the information they knew about people. Only 80 dollars. Now there working on a devices to track cars movements. Officially to make it so every county you drive through can tax you for driving in there county.
People have gotten so worried about the goverment spying on us. Well this is a form of spying. Goverment demands we have to get a permit to do something, well now they have a record of who does what. Its bad for the public to know this stuff, of course. Its also bad for the buerecrats to have a big inventory of information on us. They need limits.
As for Hegel's, well some could use that stuff. Of course they could also just hire sociologist or psychiatrist to. Plenty of those. I looked through a brochure once that Smuckers (think berry jam) had for showing off to stock holders. It said they hired a psychiatrist to help them figure out how to get the berry growers to accept low berry prices. Manipulating people is no longer just the domain of the common conman, its now a science.

[mistersquiggles]

i read most of the comments on that article, and the ones that caught my attention the most were in reference to the LEOS and battered women who get these permits and in both circumstances, its pretty obvious that those people would like some level of anonymity whether they be cop or victim, for fear of retaliation against them or their family. exposing those folks to danger in such a manner is reckless, and doesnt fall under the moniker of "journalism".... that fella is lucky that i'm not in his state, if i foud out he published my (semi) private info like that, i'd be on his doorstep, and i wouldnt play nice when i got there.........

[RandyCOG3]

OkieShooter make some valid points... "but" there is no
good reason NOT to hate the bastard's guts, and extract
some lawful retribution against him. Sure, anybody could
have done it... but we *know* HE did do it.
I just checked, and there doesn't seem to be a wikipedia
entry for him "yet"... so if one of you talented writers wants
to first to make an entry listing whateve is appropriate
about the jackass, by all means, be my guest. I'm too
tired at this point to do it myself, and I'm sure that there
is somebody better at it that I would be anyway.

RandyCOG3