Tapco stock users

[724wd]

how sturdy do these feel? is there any wobble? any issues one should know about? I like the idea of adjustable length of pull, but have never played with one. thanks

heath

[JJFranco]

how sturdy do these feel? is there any wobble? any issues one should know about? I like the idea of adjustable length of pull, but have never played with one. thanks

heath

Can you specify wich one you are talking about?

[tanstaafl4y]

I had a very detailed writeup on the cetmerifle forum...but it is now lost forever.

I had a Tapco T-6 on a Century cetme. Compared to the factory buttstock it could be adjusted to 3 inches shorter to 3 inches longer. It was very solid.

The optional rubber butt plate added 1/2 inch in length. The buttplate was, in my opinion, much needed when shooting in t-shirts. Not because it "reduced recoil" but covered the sharp bumps on the stock.

Then shooting iron sites there was no felt diffrence in cheek-to-stock weld. It was very comfortable to shoot. When scoping the rifle (tapco low swat mount with bushnell holo-site) I'd get chin-to-stock weld :eek: and had difficulty reestablishing head position between shooting sessions. I did by a "m-4" clip on scope pad, that helped, but was not an exact fit...The Tapco stock was wider than the stock the part was designed for.

I sold the stock and accesories to a forum member when I sold my cetme, maybe he will chime in with his opinions.

/Personally I think the stock is a huge benefit for someone with long arms like myself.

[jlpskydive]

I have the T-6 on an AK, AR, and SKS. Why you ask???? My wife likes to shoot all of these also. The adjustable LOP really helps her get a good set up on all three. They all feel sturdy and well made and I will continue to buy and use them. :thumbup:

[724wd]

the T-6 was what i was looking at. your answers pretty much sell me! my wife is 5'2", i am 6' and my daughter, well, she's 7 months, but someday she'll be taller than 26 inches! :thumbup: i want to get them both comfortable shooting, and and adjustable stock is the only way to go. i just didnt want a loose, shaky stock. thanks guys.
heath

[pyroclayman]

I'll testify too, (though late) to the sturdyness of the T6 stock. (not on a cetme however, but for a sks.) Some people make fun of them as "plastic inapropriatness", but they work.

For my G-3 though I went with a Magpul, but dang that was a lot of money. Like it alot though.

P

[Optimus Prime]

I need to get a cheek pad for mine on my Cetme even though I have a lo-pro scope mount on it, it's still hard to get a solid cheek weld. It's nice to be able to adjust it for bench or prone.

[Lon Moer]

I went with the ACE Ltd HK 91 receiver block (http://riflestocks.com/catalog/product_info.php?cPath=85&products_id=251) and a pig nose (http://riflestocks.com/catalog/product_info.php?cPath=85&products_id=311&osCsid=004d53e2e3c749a398a1ef2f135c6a7a) with a regular M4 receiver extension and stock.