Few months back I happened into an old National Ordnance 1903a3 Springfield. For those who don't know, National Ordnance guns are considered to be less safe to shoot than a "low serial number" 1903. I didn't get it to shoot. I was after the parts.
I had a Smith Corona barreled action drill rifle sitting in the pile O random crap. The National Ordnance a3 had an absolutely minty 6-43 Remington barrel & good bolt & the elusive Smith Corona stock. Did the needed repairs to the receiver & reassembled. Presto, a 03a3 was reborn (I'm one of those odd people who have headspace gauges and an arsenal bolt gauge on hand).
Then the bug bit me. I got the wild hair to have an example of every maker of 1903 / 1903a3 rifle. So the hunt began, & damn it if they ain't anywhere near as cheap as they were 20 years ago. Enter the drill rifles again. I found a feller with a high number Springfield 03 receiver and an early war Remington 03 receiver. I've since been able to gather all the parts & stock to put one of those back together. Minus a barrel & rear sight base. Thinking about building the other in 7.62x51mm. But thats on down the road.
Next I ended up trading off a Israeli k98 7.62 conversion for a super clean 1918 production Rock Island 1903 with a 1918 dated Springfield barrel. Shoots phenomenal.
I've since had the National Ordnance 1903a3 receiver hardness tested & it turns out to be a good one. So now I'm gathering parts to build it up as an 1903a4. Got the bolt so far.
So that will leave a Remington 1903a3 & 1903 mk1. Then maybe a USMC 1903a5 Sniper.
I know some people are against reactivation of drill rifles, but I ain't one of them. The tiny little spot weld between the barrel & receiver isn't going to affect the heat treat of the lugs. Not enough heat & to far away. I've got thousands of rounds through reweld Kalashnikov's that saw a lot more heat when being torch cut & my subsequent reweld.
Bookmarks