Results 1 to 10 of 59

Thread: CETME-47 (CETME in 7.62x39)

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Veteran
    Join Date
    Aug 2020
    Location
    SE Michigan
    Posts
    40
    Rep Power
    15

    CETME-47 (CETME in 7.62x39)

    I have been giving it some thought and instead of building my CETME kit in .308, I am going to put together a CETME in 7.62x39. From what I have been reading online the two big challenges to this are the barrel/ chamber and the locking piece. For the barrel, I plan on getting a PTR-32 barrel off of HK parts that already has the correct fluting in the chamber. For the Locking piece I plan on using a #15 RCM LP for an HK, with a new HK bolt head. (Yes I know that the general consensus it that Bolt heads and Locking Pieces cannot be swapped between a CETME and HK carrier. However, I have never seen a great explanation as to why other than “they are different sizes”. See my post here for my details on my train of thought. http://www.militaryfirearm.com/Forum...-CETME-Carrier) Ideally, I would like to make it run on standard AK magazines so I will also be designing an insert for the mag well.

    Right now I am just working on sourcing parts and making sure I get my 922r compliance in check.

    Proposed Parts List

    Base Part Kit- CETME C from Apex
    Barrel- 16” for a PTR-32
    Receiver- CETME C flat
    Trunnion- CETME C from Parts Kit.
    Muzzle attachment- US made might go for a standard cage might get something a little more exotic. Only time will tell.
    FGC- Modified/ simplified CETME Pack (Trigger and Sear welded together)
    Bolt Head and Locking Piece- New US made HK parts.
    Bolt Carrier- CETME C from parts kits
    Pistol grip- 3d Printed my design
    Stock and handguard- Custom made by me. I am currently working on making my own metal handguard fittings and will probably post a thread when I have the technique down pat.
    Cocking Handle- From parts kit
    I am also just assuming that all of the magazines parts will be foreign.

    That puts me at 7 US parts and 9 foreign parts. I might even add in a US made cocking handle if I come across one.

  2. #2
    holescreek's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    Centerville, OH
    Posts
    4,972
    Rep Power
    477
    FGC- Modified/ simplified CETME Pack (Trigger and Sear welded together)
    I believe you meant to say that you're welding the trigger to the disconnector. You won't be using the sear.

  3. #3
    WildBillCody's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    West Milford, WV
    Posts
    4,086
    Rep Power
    412
    That should be cool, I'm pretty sure I've seen it done before, I think I saw one that was made to look like a STG-44, that would be cool...
    I love you guys...

  4. #4
    holescreek's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    Centerville, OH
    Posts
    4,972
    Rep Power
    477
    I dug around a little bit for my original thread on building a Cetme in X39 back in Feb of 2010 to see if there was any useful info (not much). I was able to fix a few of the old fubared photobucket pics but don't have all of them available at the moment.
    http://www.militaryfirearm.com/Forum...consider/page3

    To put it into context, in those days the PTR32 did not exist but was being talked about in the building community. There wasn't a gun available to pattern a build after and I was just figuring out how to do chamber fluting at home . A couple weeks later, the first gen PTR32 was rolled out but was pretty rare - even back then. This all took place before the locking piece and trunnion studies and it was only my 3rd Cetme build.

    The only thing that may or may not come into play for you is the extractor mod I did (not sure how necessary it really was now). I played with shortening the recoil spring so the cartridge would eject but in retrospect that was the wrong place to start. If memory serves I ended up with a slightly shorter recoil spring and a reduced strength bolt locking lever spring. Those mods may or may not be necessary for you since you're using the correct locking piece to start with.

  5. #5
    Veteran
    Join Date
    Aug 2020
    Location
    SE Michigan
    Posts
    40
    Rep Power
    15
    Quote Originally Posted by holescreek View Post
    I believe you meant to say that you're welding the trigger to the disconnector. You won't be using the sear.
    Yes that is correct.

    Quote Originally Posted by holescreek View Post
    I dug around a little bit for my original thread on building a Cetme in X39 back in Feb of 2010 to see if there was any useful info (not much). I was able to fix a few of the old fubared photobucket pics but don't have all of them available at the moment.
    http://www.militaryfirearm.com/Forum...consider/page3

    To put it into context, in those days the PTR32 did not exist but was being talked about in the building community. There wasn't a gun available to pattern a build after and I was just figuring out how to do chamber fluting at home . A couple weeks later, the first gen PTR32 was rolled out but was pretty rare - even back then. This all took place before the locking piece and trunnion studies and it was only my 3rd Cetme build.

    The only thing that may or may not come into play for you is the extractor mod I did (not sure how necessary it really was now). I played with shortening the recoil spring so the cartridge would eject but in retrospect that was the wrong place to start. If memory serves I ended up with a slightly shorter recoil spring and a reduced strength bolt locking lever spring. Those mods may or may not be necessary for you since you're using the correct locking piece to start with.
    Thank you for digging out those old photos, I had stumbled on that thread a while back and as the saying goes, a picture is worth a thousand words. I was wondering what exactly was done to the extractor on your build. I think if I do have to go down that road I will try and pick up a PTR-32 replacement part. I don't know if it will fit in a standard Bolt Head but something in my gut tells me it is easier and cheaper to redesign a extractor than it is a bolt head.

  6. #6
    holescreek's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    Centerville, OH
    Posts
    4,972
    Rep Power
    477
    Since these guns are blowback operation the only function of the extractor is to hold the cartridge brass against the bolt head long enough for the ejector to kick it out of the receiver. As long as there is enough "grab" on the brass there shouldn't be any need to modify the extractor. The well worn Cetme model B bolt head I used for mine was a bit too sloppy for my taste and it was necessary to move the extractor in just enough to hold the brass tight. I've wondered if the PTR32's used a different bolt head than the 91 but never looked into it.

Similar Threads

  1. HK-32 7.62x39 CETME-like prototype video
    By cuda in forum Cetme/HK
    Replies: 10
    Last Post: 03-01-2019, 06:11 PM
  2. Replies: 28
    Last Post: 01-24-2014, 10:23 AM
  3. Replies: 1
    Last Post: 08-28-2013, 10:39 PM
  4. Replies: 1
    Last Post: 04-06-2012, 04:25 PM
  5. Back with a 7.62x39: Took the plunge on an IO 7.62x39
    By imarangemaster in forum AK-47/74
    Replies: 7
    Last Post: 04-03-2010, 10:30 PM

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •